Monthly Archives: January 2021
Le géant de la gestion d’actifs BlackRock suggère d’investir dans les contrats à terme de Bitcoin

BlackRock, le plus grand gestionnaire d’actifs de plusieurs billions de dollars au monde, envisage d’investir dans les contrats à terme de Bitcoin par le biais de deux de ses fonds.

Les fonds de BlackRock envisagent d’investir dans les contrats à terme de Bitcoin

Dans une paire de documents déposés auprès de la Commission américaine des valeurs mobilières (SEC) mercredi (20 janvier 2021), Blackrock a révélé que deux de ses fonds pourraient inclure b. Les fonds sont BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc et BlackRock Fund V.

Entre-temps, les dépôts ont été spécifiques sur la nature des contrats à terme de bitcoin que les fonds peuvent négocier. Selon ces documents, les fonds BlackRock ne peuvent investir que dans des contrats à terme de bitcoin réglés en espèces et négociés sur des bourses enregistrées par la Commission américaine des opérations à terme sur marchandises (CFTC).

Un extrait des documents déposés auprès de la SEC indique

“Chaque fonds peut utiliser des instruments appelés dérivés, qui sont des instruments financiers qui tirent leur valeur d’un ou plusieurs titres, de matières premières (comme l’or ou le pétrole), de devises (y compris les bitcoins), de taux d’intérêt, d’événements de crédit ou d’indices (une mesure de la valeur ou des taux, comme l’indice S&P 500 ou le taux de prêt préférentiel)”.

Les documents, cependant, ont noté les risques associés à l’investissement à terme dans les bitcoins et le marché n’était pas encore mature et pouvait présenter un risque d’illiquidité. Les documents de BlackRock ont été ajoutés :

“Des changements ou des mesures réglementaires peuvent modifier la nature d’un investissement dans des contrats à terme sur bitcoin ou restreindre l’utilisation de bitcoin ou les opérations du réseau bitcoin ou des bourses sur lesquelles bitcoin est négocié d’une manière qui affecte négativement le prix des contrats à terme sur bitcoin, ce qui pourrait avoir un impact négatif sur un Fonds”.

Bien que BlackRock n’ait pas indiqué quand les fonds commenceraient effectivement à investir dans des contrats à terme sur bitcoin, les documents déposés auprès de la SEC indiquent que la société de gestion d’actifs pèse ses options avec l’actif crypté numéro un.

Pendant ce temps, BlackRock avait envisagé d’entrer sur le marché à terme de la BTC. En 2018, le gestionnaire d’actifs a mis en place un groupe de travail chargé d’examiner les possibilités pour la société de s’aventurer dans les contrats à terme sur le bitcoin.

Comme l’a rapporté BTCManager en décembre 2020, le PDG de BlackRock, Larry Fink, a noté que le bitcoin pourrait se transformer en un actif numérique mondial. L’opinion optimiste du PDG de BlackRock sur la crypto phare a marqué un tournant par rapport à un sentiment négatif antérieur, où Fink pensait que le bitcoin était un instrument de blanchiment d’argent.

BTCManager a également fait état en décembre d’une offre d’emploi de BlackRock cherchant à embaucher un vice-président, chef de file de la chaîne d’approvisionnement.

How are blockchain products focused on agriculture doing?

There are many use cases of blockchain that can help advance the agriculture industry.

With billions of dollars at stake, are there any companies ready to push towards innovation?

Some projects have been working for years on the implementation of an idea, and based on crowdfunding, but still have not launched their product.

There is a lot of talk about the adoption of Bitcoin Superstar scam products in various industries; the agricultural sector and markets are no exception to this rule.

There are dozens of blockchain-based startups and initiatives that aim to advance agriculture. Among the most recent developments in this area is Singapore’s announcement of a contribution of $ 9 million to boost the use of blockchain in several sectors of the city’s economy.

As part of a particular partnership, Singapore’s blockchain innovation program will collaborate with agricultural startup DiMuto. The two parties aim to develop a project for traceability of agricultural products based on a blockchain system.

Blockchain is believed to help the agricultural sector in a number of ways including improving supply chain management, product authentication, inventory management, energy consumption, sustainability initiatives, and more. The question, however, is whether any of these ideas have been put into practice and how agriculture-focused blockchain products actually fare today.

Digitize data to prove the viability of agricultural products

To answer these questions, BeInCrypto called on Paul Ryan, executive director and co-founder of Aglive. It is a startup that deploys blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT) data to track products from creation to plate by digitizing the food supply chain. This Australian company has an active product and is already working with farmers.

According to Ryan, the market for agrotechnology is there, and it may enable “the ability to fully track and provide evidence for all data points in the supply chain visible to all, which has resulted in consumers the opportunity to get exactly what they bought ”. He added :

Food fraud is a major problem, costing up to $ 40 billion a year. The blockchain allows us to guarantee that our products are legitimate and safe. Families deserve to know that everything they buy is exactly what it says it says.

The agricultural industry could benefit greatly from the gradual introduction of blockchain technology. That said, one of the main challenges is that agriculture is an industry that often lags behind in terms of technological innovation, Ryan said. Many farmers continue to use paper records, which makes managing farm data difficult and time consuming.

In addition to tracking products from farm to fork, allowing for greater analysis, information sharing and improved procedures, blockchain can be used to ensure financial stability and subsidize those working in the field of agriculture.

According to Ryan, some farmers want to double the value of their income. They have no hope, however, unless they can raise capital for the farming community to protect their livestock from drought, improve their methods and equipment. To ensure the cash flow, you need banks that have confidence in agricultural practices. He also clarified:

Traceability makes it possible to titrate loans. If farmers have a steady cash flow from blockchain-based loans, they can focus on what they do best. This is a unique opportunity to connect the dots and strengthen the confidence of insurers and financiers. Data comes first: once you get it and it’s accessible via blockchain, you can turn the farming practice into a value-added service, because all the information is there and verified. The blockchain will boost investor confidence.

Fintech, Bitcoin and the Banks: War, Marriage or None of the Above?

Technology has come to finance to stay. What can Bitcoin do in the middle of this?

The pandemic has served as a catalyst for many processes. And, in many ways, it’s been very revealing. I mean, many assumptions have been refuted. And many other things have been reaffirmed. It’s interesting to review, at the beginning of 2021, the 2019 predictions about the future in a kind of before and after. The Bitcoin narrative had many hypotheses about banks, the dollar and crises. But I’m afraid that many of them didn’t come true. However, Bitcoin is thriving for other reasons. We’re talking about Fintech, Bitcoin and the banks in a post-public world.

The early Bitcoin community was basically made up of libertarians, anarchists and cypherpunks. That is, the original group emerged from the counterculture. A strong ideological component was obviously there from the beginning. The thing about small, inconsequential groups is that they live forever in opposition. Therefore, they are always right. Radicalism grows easily when theories can be maintained in the hypothetical. Of course, once the group becomes larger, things are forced to change. In many ways, they moderate themselves. The Bitcoin community has been undergoing a very significant gradual demographic transformation over the past 5 years.

Retail speculators played a major role in the 2017 boom, and institutional investors are now taking over. This new group is becoming the new majority. But that’s not all. With their arrival, they are changing the narrative. That is, Bitcoin is more popular now. Their buyers are more conventional. Consequently, their community is more conventional. Although there are still many old-school libertarian influencers, the center of gravity is shifting to the big institutions. In other words, Bitcoin is becoming more like Wall Street.

I remember as yesterday the predictions of the most well known bitcoiners about the future crisis. In January 2020, there was talk of the end of the dollar, of high inflation, and the fall of the banks. And not only that. It was said that people would buy Bitcoin because of a hecatomb of the system. Bitcoin was presented as a lifeline in the end times. In many ways, Bitcoin, for the libertarians, is a messianic movement. And the narrative is primarily based on fear, imitating the habits and tone of the golden beetles. This revolutionary Bitcoin is important to many. But it’s not the only Bitcoin that exists. The libertarian utopia is very important to libertarians, but once you get out of that little circle, people have no idea what they’re talking about.

Bitcoin’s behavior during the crisis offers enough evidence to cast doubt on many of the libertarian hypotheses. To begin with, the behavior of the dollar and inflation during this year. Additionally, the huge correlation between Bitcoin and other risky assets. It’s not just that the libertarian hypotheses failed. It’s that they failed hugely. Almost everything turned out to be the opposite of what was predicted. The crisis generated deflation. And the panic consolidated the strength of the dollar as a safe haven, generating a crash for Bitcoin and the other financial markets.

Despite having very bad futurists, Bitcoin thrived in 2020. Why did this happen? The pandemic accelerated the digitalization of the world. And, because of the deflationary crisis, central banks were forced to inject astronomical amounts of liquidity into the system to boost demand. This gigantic shower of money greatly benefited technology companies. Everything related to online trading and digital payments received great support. In other words, the fintech sector became one of the centers of attention of the moment.

In other words, Fintech is the future.

Paypal, Stripe, and Square are in fashion. But it wasn’t just online payments that gained new popularity during the pandemic. Companies like Robinhood and TD Ameritrade also took a big leap in the same period. Online trading became a trend, but online speculation also became a trend. But not in the context of a liberating revolution. What we actually have in a technological boom that embarks Fintech, online trading, logistics, renewable energy, Artificial Intelligence, the cloud, Big Data, blockchain, bitcoin and automation.

What we are experiencing is not the collapse of the system. Quite the contrary. What we are experiencing is an asymmetric recovery that has benefited the technology sector quite a bit. The banks have suffered from the increase in defaults due to the crisis. These are cyclical companies that are

XRP investors petition the White House against SEC lawsuit

A new petition wants to stop the US Securities and Exchange Commission charges against Ripple.

While the XRP course has plummeted and publisher Ripple is preparing for the upcoming trial, some investors have teamed up and petitioned the White House against the SEC charges

The corresponding petition on the website “We the People”, which belongs to the White House, calls on the federal government to “classify the virtual currency XRP as a currency”. A concern for which over 10,000 signatures have already been collected.

The website, which was launched by the Obama administration in 2011, enables American citizens to start petitions. If a petition collects at least 100,000 signatures within 30 days, the White House then has to deal with it automatically. Although the platform is primarily used for serious political requests, there have also been a few jokes. In one of the largest petitions to date, the construction of a Death Star was requested.

In the XRP petition, the US Securities and Exchange Commission is now being asked to “drop” its “unjustified” charge against the cryptocurrency. The petitioner, i.e. the creator of the petition, refers to a previous classification by the supervisory authority FinCEN, which has classified XRP as a currency. He also cites the rapid decline in value of the cryptocurrency, which is already known within the industry as the “ third largest crash in history ”.

As a result, “hundreds of thousands of Americans” would have suffered irreparable damage and losses

While XRP investors want to exert influence in this way, XRP publisher Ripple is preparing for an initial hearing in the legal dispute with the SEC. However, time is already running out for the crypto payment service provider, because more and more crypto exchanges are removing XRP from their listings . Accordingly, in a press release, Ripple asked that investors wait for their own arguments before they jump to conclusions.

The XRP publisher should work hard, because even some investors are already doubting the effectiveness of the new petition:

“I have a feeling we could collect a million signatures and it wouldn’t do any good. Nonetheless, I signed. “